THE POLITICAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW

The International Criminal Court

The Kosovo bombing campaign has proven that legal considerations may form an action. It HAS ALSO been denied a statement of realism that says that the country has always had the authority to Legalize any action there is. Here Also said that the country would neglect the need to be Able to Legalize Reviews their position, but certainly every action has consequences roomates wasted a lot of time every country to be Able to search for rational reasons.

Therefore, the lack of legitimacy of the reasons available will limit the behavior of countries except countries that have the power to do it, where they did not use reasonable arguments and Rely on violence. This examination Showed the targets of the NATO policy, even the world's most powerful military alliance are aware of the need to justify his actions before the trial by the domestic and world public opinion. And the fact that the leader of the Alliance know that they will be called upon to defend Reviews their targets is one of the factors restricting on what could be attacked. 

This makes NATO get a load of the basic law is the which is derived from democratic countries that must be answered the public before the domestic and global media are ready to expose fissures Among the reasons behind human intervention and the way it is used. The legal presumption that the bombing strategy was not to be read as a proponent of 'law as a rule'.

This is a way to think that there is a view that objective roomates or legal right of men and women can perform legal reasoning is strong and valid. If this is the case, it will be Necessary to evidence Disputes between States that NATO, HRW and AI for the legal implementation of the OAF has been resolved, Because one side of the legal considerations that apply. In fact, this case shows that an agreement on the rules of the relevant law is the guarantee that the actor will approve Reviews their application in specific cases. The fact that AI and HRW give Conclusions different from what has been implemented by legal entities illustrate the problem of uncertainty law. 

See Also The Kosovo Bombing Compaign

The New Haven tries to solve this problem by making the human dignity as a universal moral Precept that should be used to Decide between conflicting lawsuits. The problem is that this path will not solve the problem of legal Disputes Because both its meaning and application to specific cases will be highly debated. AI and HRW would Interpretations Reviews their claim on the law to be a valid thing, but this can not be legally determined by reference to the purpose of human dignity or other conceptions of the good. 

The two human rights organizations-especially AI-too dogmatic stated that NATO'S action Cleary violated IHL. They Mobilize and persuade the case against NATO, but facts and evidence law to this case is not enough to warrant a determination of legal certainty. AI and HRW challenging legal NATO Protocol No. 1 in the field, but they missed the chance to pull out a deeper challenge against moral and hidden Assumptions that support the laws of war. Questioning the law what was Considered a military targets is valid but does not include the important question.

Report by AI and HRW criticized NATO for not flying the aircraft at low altitude to allow a better target of discrimination and not to give warnings when preparing to attack facilities dual-purpose (as stipulated in article 57 (2) (c) of Protocol 1). 82 the reasons behind Reviews These two military operations is the safety procedures ofNATO crew. The challenge of balancing the moral risk faced by combatants and Civilians can not be Decided by application of the law. But if Civilians are better safeguarded in the future, change the laws of war could Facilitate this.

There are two significant obstacles to further tighten the loopholes in the Protocol 1. The first is that Effectively increases the legal standards of civil protection in humanitarian interventions in the future but will require the State to accept the risk that rising against Reviews their military. But as the Independent International Commission on Kosovo Showed, there is a balance here, as the country is being asked to take the risk for the purposes of humanity, and may be reluctant to do so. '85 of Reviews 

These concerns are borne out by the case of Kosovo. Commitment to the protection force causes the selected bombardment as a means of intervention, and shaped the implementation of the air campaign. Ignatieff argue that NATO 'Warfare' 86 without the risk of conflicts with human rights is important Because it is assumed that 'our lives are more important than us intervention.